Some thoughts on lateral hires
May 9th, 2011 by Jim Cotterman
I was asked recently about lateral hires and compensation practices. My response, which goes beyond compensation, follows. If the firms don’t do these other things well it matters very little about the compensation. And even if the compensation is well done, the other things here are critically important for the hire to be successful.
1. Lateral candidates tend to promise more then they can deliver in terms of how much and how quickly their practice will move. This is not an intentional overstatement as their firm is equally off at the other end on how much lost business will occur. The clients have the final word on this matter and their response may not be what either the candidate or the firm anticipated. Another factor (hopefully) is that candidates are inexperienced at picking up a practice and moving it. If the partner is experienced at moving their practice that should tell you something as well!
2. Candidates may be making the change for reasons they do not fully understand (which could lead to post change remorse once it is all sorted out).
3. Firm’s due diligence is often lacking with little or no credentialing, insufficient analysis of candidate’s practice (see number 1 above) and insufficient evaluation of how good a fit this person is with group, office and firm overall (see partially number 2 above).
4. Each firm needs to have a really good handle on what it is paying its equivalently performing partners. It is very bad for morale if current partners are paid less than the incoming laterals. But how many times do we hear partners lament about this very situation? And if this situation is a symptom of some problems with a current program, they are exacerbated when laterals are kept whole.
5. My personal observation is that firms will often pay very high in the market range, even above range, to seal the deal with a lateral partner. But it is important to note that there is always someone who can and will outbid you. Further, money does not buy loyalty — it can only arrange a short term rental. Finally, once you set the initial compensation so high, where do you go from there and how do you recreate internal equity when the time comes to fully integrate the lateral into the firm’s program?
6. Smart candidates avoid having a target painted on their backs with a high signing bonus, high draw, high guarantee — they will look for assurance of “X” if they deliver “Y”, which is reasonable because they don’t have relationships in the firm or experience with the new firm’s particular politics. They will be willing to share in risk and reward with the the rest of the partners to some extent and will look for a fair draw. There is a real need to strike the right balance between comfort for the new person and full integration into the firm’s program. Some may consider this next comment a bit unusual, but I recommend laterals have an active mentor — maybe the partner who sponsored their candidacy — to improve the integration and to catch/head off the difficulties that will invariably arise.
7. The above comment leads me to this next thought that there is really very little effort to integrate partners into the group, office or firm overall once they arrive (or at least after the initial honeymoon period). Moreover, since they are not well plugged in they find themselves having to market internally nearly as hard as they have to externally.
This entry was posted on Monday, May 9th, 2011 at 6:10 pm and is filed under Legal Profession, Economics, Partner compensation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.